Blog 6
Once again, while reading this
article, I found similarities to other articles we’ve read, and namely the
religion one and the synchronicity article. There is a common theme of people
feeling stuck and then having the resource of career counselors to promote that
their goals have meaning. In terms of religion, the meaning was a divine
purpose, in synchronicity it was connected things that were present to give a
push in the right direction, and in this article it is coming across in the
word “absorbedness,” or giving people of all ages meaning for why they are
doing what they are doing. The article also presents the idea of a “complex
adaptive entity” (2005, pg. 195) which, Bronowski talks about in almost the
exact same language as Guindon used to describe synchronicity when describing
the interconnectedness of all people and events in the world (Bloch, 2005, pg.
196).
I think these connections are so
important to see because it is a pattern that we will come across in all
aspects of life. As I pointed out in class, some of us had strong negative
reactions to the religion article because of the fanaticism about choosing a
career because of a call from God, while others had the same hard-to-believe
attitude about synchronicity. The fact that these articles are saying almost
identical messages but with different labels creates strong reactions in
people, and I strongly connect that to my LGBT group. So many times people will
be working toward the same goal (maybe not a specific, tangible goal because
then we have to factor in the contact hypothesis), and different groups of
people are judged differently or not welcomed into the group because of their
sexual identity.
It was stressful to think of all 11
points relating to the complex adaptive entity (and it probably isn’t a good
sign that every time I want to type that phrase I need to go back into the
article to remember exactly what it is called) but it really helped me when
Bloch gave examples that didn’t relate to careers. To anyone who is having a
hard time grasping the concept, think of it the way she explained it: CAE could
be anything from cells to world economies (2005, pg. 197). Once she started
relating it to careers it all made sense with the fluidity, growth, and
limitations that we’ve learned about in other theories, but I am excited to
challenge myself into finding ways to remember all 11 points leading up to the
actual application.
Bloch, D. (2005). Complexity, chaos, and nonlinear dynamics: A new perspective
on career development theory. The
career development quarterly, 53, 194-206.
No comments:
Post a Comment