Blog 5
At first I was a little confused by
the meaning of synchronicity, no matter how explicitly it was stated in the
first paragraph of Guindon’s article (2002, pg 195). Do all of my blogs begin with
me being confused? That’s okay, I just think that is the best way for me to
address my concerns and hopefully move forward through all of the theorists we
are learning about. Anyway, as I read through this article, I made the word
“synchronicity” synonymous with “serendipity” in my head. When it came to
applying the term to career counseling, however, synchronicity became more
clearly defined as a technique to help people find the meaning in their lives or jobs instead of them just happening
across an inexplicable coincidence.
My confusion dissipated (and I
assumed they would more so with the promised case studies) on page 198 when
Guindon wrote about the philosophical and religious background of applying synchronicity.
Not only does the term have the fate-esque aspect of seemingly random events, but
Guindon specifically refers to synchronicity as the “consequence” of these random
events (2002). This idea began to connect with the original presentation that
synchronicity can be applied to career counseling in order to open client’s
eyes about their path in life because it showed that a counselor can use synchronicity
(whether through guided meditation or another active method) to show a person
how their life choices are connected for a reason that may lead them to what
they are meant to do as a career.
I know that frequently I say that I
like the current proposed theory more than the last theory we learned about
because they progressively tend to focus on the individual and less on the idea
of being either right or wrong in a career choice, so I am going to follow suit
yet another time. On page 200 in Dan’s story, we hear all about how unhappy Dan
is in his job even though it matched his
Holland Code (Guindon, 2002). While I wasn’t morally opposed to Holland’s
Code like I was, say, Parson’s Trait and Factor Theory, I still wasn’t
completely feeling the idea that answering a couple questions about whether or
not you like drumming or being a leader can determine your career path. Dan’s
case study shows perfectly how there are so many factors, such as family needs,
joy, and location, that need to be taken into consideration when counseling
someone on their careers, and perhaps synchronicity is the one I’ve been
waiting for (until I read next week’s article. . .)
Guindon, M. H., & Hanna, F. J.
(2002). Coincidence, happenstance, serendipity, fate, or the hand of God: Case
studies in synchronicity. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(3), 195-208.
No comments:
Post a Comment